The Most Popular Republican Presidential Candidate on the Internet
I recently found out that the Republican candidate for United States President with the most friends on MySpace is — get this — not Mitt Romney, not Rudy Giuliani, not John McCain...but Ron Paul. It's true.
For those who don't know what MySpace is, it's a social networking site a la Friendster. Basically you create a profile, and your friends link to you from their profiles. It's somehow become the in thing for celebrities to have — everyone from rock bands to Presidential candidates have a MySpace profile.
Now, in the age of the information revolution, the internet can make or break a candidacy. Last year, Virginia Senator George Allen lost his campaign for re-election after a racially-tinged comment made it onto Youtube. Meanwhile, candidates like Howard Dean in 2004 leveraged the internet to raise funds and propel themselves from nowhere into the lead. Today, every candidate is relying extensively on the internet.
I am really surprised and pleased that Ron Paul is the leading Republican candidate on MySpace. Paul ran for President on the Libertarian ticket in the past, before turning Republican, but his beliefs remain libertarian-aligned. As a libertarian-leaning centrist, I'm certainly happy that the MySpace Republicans are choosing a philosophy that's more in line with true freedom.
I would be very happy if this "netroots" support eventually translates into Paul becoming a frontrunner for the Presidency. He has been very critical of the Iraq War, and if there's one Republican the Americans need now, it's a Republican who would repeal draconian laws like the PATRIOT Act, get America out of Iraq, and push for true free trade and enterprise.
Not all's positive, however. Paul opposes income taxes, and seems to believe that poverty is not something the government ought to address. As I've written before, though, poverty can be shown to be an externality, and taxes are needed to finance things like public education and healthcare to address the externality of poverty.
Paul also wants to tie the American currency to the gold standard, which doesn't make much sense, since the value of gold is affected mainly by things like booms and busts in the dentistry industry. Unfortunately, central banks are a necessary part of the modern economy, though Paul's sentiments are admirable — he wants to abolish the Federal Reserve to force the government to choose between raising taxes and cutting spending, instead of giving it a way out through borrowing.
How likely is it that Paul will become the frontrunner for the nomination? Not really. But just remember — around this time in 1991, Bill Clinton wasn't on anyone's map. He was just some obscure Governor and a political unknown. But in politics, a week is a longtime. Paul really has something going for him if his netroots support is so strong.
I'm still partial to the Democrats, and I'm still hoping for a Clinton-Obama ticket, but it wouldn't be a bad thing to actually have a sort of decent Republican on the ticket for once. At least then we could be assured of a half-decent President, whether the Americans choose a Republican or Democrat.
Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.
Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.
Comments
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)
| Related comments from forum thread "George Bush": | |
|---|---|
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 10:37:45 am Nov 20, 2005
Do you think he won the last election fair and square? (We all know he won the 2000 election by cheating, so get over it.) Will the scandals involving Karl Rove (commonly referred to as Bush's brain) end up tipping Bush over as well? What do you make of his disapproval rating that currently stands at 40%, and the fact that more Americans say they trusted Clinton than say they trust Bush? (Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives for telling a half-truth about a blowjob in testimony for a case investigating inappropriate conduct related to a sale of real estate.) I find it strange how Bush has managed to maintain the support of so many for his idiocy. Sure, Kerry was a terrible dude - nobody can deny that. But it's hard to argue he's worser than Bush. Most attempts I've seen to portray him as a flip-flopper oversimplify his views. (I can relate to that, because most of my complicated views often end up oversimplified by people trying to rebutt them.) Most exit polls declared Kerry the winner, and 57,000 complaints about the electoral process were submitted in Ohio alone. Not to mention that Bush has conducted the war in a completely f***ed up manner. Most attempts to defend the lack of body armour for the troops blame it on Clinton downsizing the military, but you'd think a military that had already conducted a war in another country (Afghanistan) two years before would have had the time to take stock and re-equip itself, wouldn't you? Oh, and let's not forget WAR CRIMES WAR CRIMES WAR CRIMES OMG. (Warning: Watching this video has been described as worse than watching the Al-Qaeda beheadings.) Your thoughts? |
| Last five replies (8 comments not shown): | |
|
Nuitari
Member Posts: 224 IP Logged | Posted at 3:21:24 am Dec 3, 2005
i said it might be muslim propeganda |
|
chickster
Member Posts: 168 IP Logged | Posted at 5:33:43 am Dec 5, 2005
"might" only wat |
|
Nuitari
Member Posts: 224 IP Logged | Posted at 9:26:55 am Dec 6, 2005
it mostly is mr. muslim lover ~lame i noe~ just asking y DO u side with them? they are nthn but a pain in the ass |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 10:28:31 am Dec 6, 2005
Way to go, tarring 1 billion+ people with the same brush. Do you have any idea what the s*** you're pulling out of your a** is? |
|
kufar
Member Posts: 23 IP Logged | Posted at 7:21:34 am Oct 16, 2006
John Lee Ming Kuan is actually unofficially a Muslim. He has yet to convert. On this forum in the past, he has said he will abstain from voting of he has to choose between BN and PAS by spoiling his vote. The reason he does so is so he will not lose his PAS friends who say he is spoiling their chance at winning election by voting. So, its people like John who spoils their vote - that is how PAS came to power in Kelantan and Trengganu. I strongly believe that video he linked is forged. And also, there is nothing wrong in America kiling Iraqi Muslims as PAS kills murtads (apostates) daily in Kelantan by public beheading. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and those 57 other Muslim lands also kill murtads screaming Allah Akbar. Life of a life. John is also a friend of Muslim terrorist, MENJ who operates 2 blogs (www.menj.org) and (www.noorullah.org) advocating murdering murtads in Malaysia and elsewhere. To murder a murtad is to murder Chinese or non Muslim since to apostate from Islam is to become non Muslim under 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Chinese = Bukan Islam (this includes Indians, Portugese, Dayak, etc) Melayu = Islam (this can include Arabs) Who will I vote for in general elections or by elections? Let us support I am voting in Pengkalan Pasir by election and there are 3 candidates, PAS, BN and Ibrahim Ali. I will vote BN, as voting for Ibrahim Ali means voting for PAS, and voting for PAS means voting tor murder of Chinese. I will _not_ spoil my vote as this means abstain from voting giving bad impression that I have a "tidak apa attitude". Rather, I will annoy PAS by campaigning against it by voting for BN. Please note that I am not BN supporter in specific sense and a stauch DAP supporter. However, I vote pragmatically and so, if there is no DAP, but only PAS or PKR versus BN, I vote for BN. Hancur PAS. Hancur PKR. Hancur Anwar Ibrahim. Jahanam Islam. |
