Infernal Ramblings
A Malaysian Perspective on Politics, Society and Economics

What's Good for Business is Good for the Economy?

Written by johnleemk on 3:57:48 pm Jul 1, 2007.
Categories: ,

One thing I find really annoying in politics is the presumption that if you want a strong economy, you have to support business.

For instance, I recently read in Fortune that there were fears Hillary Clinton (my preferred candidate for the US presidency) would not be able to manage the economy because as a Senator, she has voted with the Chamber of Commerce position about half of the time, and with the National Association of Manufacturers about 16% of the time.

Although Fortune was careful to only state that businesspeople had reason to be wary of Clinton, the obvious implication was that she would not be an ideal candidate on economic policy issues.

This is a ridiculous implication, considering that the economy is made up of both consumers and producers. Now, obviously they are not always at loggerheads, but as Milton Friedman pointed out:

With some notable exceptions, businessmen favor free enterprise in general but are opposed to it when it comes to themselves.
Free enterprise is good for the economy, but it is not necessarily good for businessmen. That is why those who are pro-capitalism should not necessarily be pro-business.

If anything, we should probably be glad that Clinton does not have such a stellar record from a businessperson's viewpoint. Quoth Friedman:
The broader and more influential organisations of businessmen have acted to undermine the basic foundation of the free market system they purport to represent and defend.
A 45% figure probably makes sense for the Chamber of Commerce; it indicates a candidate who is either really a waffler, a pragmatic candidate who can balance the sometimes conflicting interests of consumers and producers for the greater good of the economy.

The 16% figure for manufacturers? Well, considering that manufacturers only make up one segment of the economy — a dwindling one, I might add, since the service sector is growing in importance — it is not something that should be of too great concern.

Hillary Clinton of course has her flaws. I think her opposition to school vouchers, for example, is misplaced. That's the kind of economic policy people should be taking her to task for — not over silly things like not supporting business no matter what.

If you'd like to keep informed about updates to the site, consider subscribing to our web feed:

Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.

Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.

Najib's Orwellian 1Malaysia

Most Recently Read

  1. My Boss, Nathaniel Tan, Martyred by the Special Branch
  2. Abundance is Nothing
  3. Lessons to Learn From Ireland's Economy
  4. Cutting the VAT for Green Products?
  5. Separating Head of State from Head of Government
  6. Charity is Not Enough
  7. Ad Hominem: How Malaysians Lose the Plot
  8. Monetary Benefits of Trade
  9. Government Failure and the Tragedy of the Commons
  10. You Have No Reason to Vote Barisan Nasional
Quoth the webserver...
Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.
— Frédéric Bastiat