Irrationality and Anti-Americanism
One problem with Malaysians, as I overheard a biology lecturer telling his students, is that we are far too easily swayed by emotions, without rationally considering the issue at hand. Witness, for example, how we have reacted to cutbacks in government subsidies — an issue I dealt with in The People Are As Much to Blame As the Government one and a half years ago. Or look at the utter inability of opposition supporters to understand why boycotting elections will kill them, something I tackled in Boycotting Elections is A Road to Failure. Or the deification of Mahathir. Or international trade. Or evolution. The list really could go on and on forever. One issue, however, that really irks me in addition to these peeves, is the rabid anti-Americanism so prevalent in Malaysia and much of the rest of the world.
I have expressed my utter distaste for the policies of the present administration before. I think that George W. Bush has been one of the worst US Presidents, and is easily the worst in recent memory, perhaps rivalling Richard Nixon.
And even then, Nixon's personal perfidy at least did not seriously jeopardise America or the world. He manipulated the election, a serious offense, and later attempted to cover it up. But instead of starting wars, he ended them, and his policies did not do any lasting damage to the US (though some might argue that he significantly eroded American trust in their federal institutions).
What, on the other hand, has Bush done? He has infringed on the liberties of Americans, run an inefficient and ineffective domestic policy programme, and worst of all, squandered all the goodwill the world had towards America and Americans in the wake of 9/11.
It wasn't so long ago that the people of the world were proud to proclaim that "we are all Americans". Today, many of us wouldn't be caught dead being associated with America. It's very safe to say that Bush has done great damage to America's international standing that may take generations to repair.
But this is simply no excuse for the world to hate Americans. It's one thing to launch into a tirade against American policies. It's another to assume that all Americans share their government's views or motives.
One thing I've found is that a lot of people have a fundamental mistrust of the American government's motives. Fair enough. The trouble is, they go on to assume that the American people share their government's alleged intention to spill "blood for oil".
These perceptions are simply totally unjustified. I've debated politics with many Americans from both sides of the political spectrum, and found that a very tiny fringe minority take a xenophobic or American supremacist view of foreign policy.
Rather, most Americans are like most people anywhere in the world — concerned about their country, and concerned about the world. The problem with Americans is not a lack of good intentions on their part. More often than not, the problem is their lack of information about the effects of their actions, and how they will be viewed by the world.
People often get caught up in an anti-American frenzy to the point that they mistrust Americans. It's fine to mistrust the American government, but the American people's motives are far more difficult to call into question. Many of them, for example, honestly believed they were doing Iraqis and the world a favour by invading Iraq. They were misled by their government, but at heart, they had the right intentions.
Unfortunately, people don't like to think. If we stopped to actually muse rationally about the situation, we'd see that Americans are not the bloodthirsty monsters you might think they are from reading some of the propaganda put out by activists in the third world. (As an aside, this seems to be one of the few times that the term "third world" can be used properly.)
It's important to distinguish between a government and a people. The two are not always the same. If you ever doubt this, just make a note of the fact that surveys indicate most Americans wish Bush's Presidency was over now. That says it all, I think.
Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.
Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.
Comments
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)
| Related comments from forum thread "Osama and Bush are friends!?": | |
|---|---|
|
TheRipper
Member Posts: 250 IP Logged | Posted at 8:21:35 am Oct 17, 2005
do u guyz think there might be a secret alliance between bush and osama?i mean....the 911 incident might be bush's idea to destroy america cuz he might be a muslim,so osama gets all the blame because they both agree to make osama as the scapegoat.who knows it might be bush driving the plane and jump off the plane before it crashes to the world trade center... |
| Last five replies (0 comments not shown): | |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 8:56:57 am Oct 17, 2005
Well, on the serious side, anything's possible. I prefer shaving with Occam's Razor, though; the least complicated explanation is the correct one. So I don't think there's a real conspiracy or anything. Bush is just an incompetent dog. On the unserious side...I bet the real Bush went crazy and piloted a plane into the WTC. Then he was replaced by a puppet look-alike, manipulated by neocons like Cheney. Osama was in on all this, as it was an elaborate plot to create construction work for the bin Laden family (I'm sure if you trace the connections of those involved in rebuilding the Pentagon and WTC, they lead straight back to the bin Ladens) and for Cheney to become the effective president. |
|
bentmw
Gamemaster Member Posts: 219 IP Logged | Posted at 1:42:10 am Oct 18, 2005
yea.but seriously....why has the case come to a complete stop..? why isn osama being looked for..!? why have they just dropped the case like that...? its all so weird.. |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 10:06:39 am Oct 18, 2005
Check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories Osama was in cahoots with the US to invade Iraq. That way, his family could rebuild the area, the US would get its oil, and Bush would be re-elected. ^_^ |
|
tanstaafl
Member Posts: 9 IP Logged | Posted at 1:42:18 pm Mar 16, 2007
While I agree in principle with the sentiment outlined in your post, I believe it is a fallacy to ascribe the actions of the US government to one man i.e. the POTUS. Given the consistency of US foreign policy over the last 50 years, it seem hard not to believe that a significant portion of the movers and shakers in the US share the certain fundamental beliefs, one of which being the rightness of the actions of the US of A in all things regardless of consequences to others. However, there is a distinction between the power elite and the man in the street and it is important that this distinction always be borne in mind. On a parting note, I would state that American are no less lazy when it comes to thinking than people of less developed countries e.g. the polls that indicate that a majority (albeit getting smaller) still believe Iraq had something to do with 9/11 or that WMD was found in Iraq despite all evidence unearthed to the contrary to-date. |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 11:37:03 pm Mar 16, 2007
Well, yeah, I bashed the neocons behind Bush's policies in one of my very first articles. I think I also referred to the "American government" quite a bit, not just Bush. But like it or not, if Bush hadn't been elected, the neocons would not be controlling American foreign policy today. |
