Mediocrity, Dumbing Down Malaysian Students
Some time back, one of my mother's acquaintances told her something about the Malaysian education system: it's only good for mediocre students.
When my mother told me about this, I thought it was quite an interesting remark to make. After reflecting on it, I realised that it was probably a very accurate characterisation of the education system.
The most intelligent people I know have rarely been able to fully utilise their potential in the typical public schools here. Meanwhile, I think it is quite undeniable that those whose intellect is below the median are not adequately served either by the education system.
The biggest problem, I would surmise, is that of emphasising memorisation over understanding. Almost anyone who works hard enough at it can pick up memorisation. It's much more difficult to understand something you learn.
For those of above average intellect, it's not that big a deal to memorise things, but the concepts of opportunity cost and comparative advantage come into play — rote memorisation can be detrimental to the application of that intellect.
Of course, that's not to mention the stubborn few who don't like to play by the rules and refuse to apply themselves to blind memorisation, like me. We end up with mediocre grades.
Meanwhile, those who are below the median intelligence don't have it easy either. They often are not cut out for either memorising or understanding, and so suffer.
Making matters worse is the emphasis of the education system on the academic stream. We need people in vocational and technical areas as much as in academic fields, but all the emphasis is on getting into the science stream, regardless of whether the sciences are the right field for you.
The result is an education system that serves nobody — it dumbs everyone down into mediocrity. The intelligent are forced to squander their talent on memory-centric tasks; the average are not encouraged to surpass themselves but be content with memorising what they cannot understand; the less than average are just ignored altogether.
Why is it that we cannot have an education system which does not give its people the cookie-cutter treatment? Why cannot our education system recognise that every student, every teacher, every community, has different needs and abilities, and give them the freedom to act accordingly? Why?
Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.
Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.
Comments
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)
| Related comments from forum thread "Mediocrity, Dumbing Down Malaysian Students": | |
|---|---|
|
eyeonmalaysia
Member Posts: 2 IP Logged | Posted at 10:08:21 am Aug 22, 2007
The public education system from primary school right through to university is defective, students are not taught how to think, they are taught how to blindly follow. This is not accidental, it is a deliberate government policy designed to cultivate semi-educated followers, who slavishly follow the leaders come what may. These products of the local schools, colleges and universities of Malaysia are generally mediocre, untalented and good for little else than the subservient civil (government) service. Sadly a lot of things stink in the country of Malaysia. When will the citizens wake up and put things right? |
| Last five replies (0 comments not shown): | |
|
ckng02474
Member Posts: 14 IP Logged | Posted at 5:48:27 pm Mar 11, 2008
Good post on diagnosing what is wrong with the current education system in Malaysia. I would add that I too had to relearn how to learn from scratch when I left Malaysia for Australia years ago. It was a painful realization that my years of studies and the study skills that I had under my belt were for nought. Funnily, today as I work in a non-Malaysian environment, I find those memorization skills extremely useful. A note of caveat to your line of thought is, Japan does have a system not unlike ours, and yet they have prospered. And China too has a system which roots goes back some 2500 years based on memorization and rote learning. I remain uncertain about the role of rote learning in education. There has to be some degree of rote learning by any student from any cultural setting. But I do agree with you that being good at exam taking and memorization, when combined in a society that does not appreciate nor condone critical thinking, the outcome can be devastating bad. This is especially true when one is trying to develop critical thinking capabilities in the minds of the young. On a final note, do you think older Malaysians and those who lord over the masses would like to have a younger generation of people who can think critically? Think of the implications, intended or otherwise, on social interactions, in politics, and in religious affairs. In my mind, culture matters more than we dare to give its due. |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 10:29:34 pm Mar 11, 2008
Some memorisation is useful, but the extent to which it has been abused in Malaysia makes it all but useless. A useful anecdote for illustrating the difference is a story I have been told about Japan. A technical worker in a Japanese electronics manufacturing plant noticed that trains would pass by the plant on a regular basis, and surmised that this would result in manufacturing defects - she was of course right. Memorising the principles behind the manufacturing process can only take you so far - if you cannot apply them as she did, there is no point in having memorised them. Here is a good counterpart to that anecdote about how blind memorisation, without accompanying understanding, has no use. |
|
Joon Ian
Member Posts: 1 IP Logged | Posted at 11:49:55 pm Mar 20, 2008
But how is the same subject taught to American students in a public high-school? Further differentiate that by plugging in the socio-geographic dimensions of the school's location. My guess is, it'll be rather different from how they teach the same thing at Dartmouth College. |
