Malaysian Politicians State the Obvious
One thing I've always noticed from a tender age is the incredible propensity of our politicians to mouth inane and obvious statements. This is especially so for our "leaders" in the Barisan Nasional regime.
Our government prides itself on its visionary leaders. After all, BN is the government that gave us the Bangsa Malaysia and Wawasan 2020 policies — things that are hardly to be balked at. But anyone can make a simple truistic statement of ideals and principles.
The question is, can our leaders put their visionary ideals into practice? Yes, Dr. Mahathir, we know that members of the Bangsa Malaysia are "people being able to identify themselves with the country, speak Bahasa Malaysia and accept the Constitution" — but how far has BN put this principle into practice? Even leaders from Mahathir's own party refuse to accept the Constitution.
Stating the obvious is not good enough for leadership. How many times have we heard a Prime Minister urge civil servants to work harder? How many times has a Minister promised to "look into this matter" or "treat this issue very seriously"? How many times have members of the government stated the obvious, such as that we need to protect the environment or provide more jobs for the unemployed?
Here's a clue, para Yang Berhormat and Yang Amat Berhormat: "looking into this matter" and taking it seriously is your job. Why are you telling us that you will be doing your job? Stop stating the bloody obvious and do your job, rather than telling us that you will be doing it.
Then again, considering how little work our public servants do, and their penchant for lying about taking action, it's not surprising that Ministers would want to cover their ass by promising that something will be done — and then putting up their legs, kicking back, and doing nothing at all.
These inanities are nothing new. I honestly don't understand why Mahathir is so renowned for bringing efficiency and dedication to the business of government. I've been reading the newspapers for almost ten years, and if there's one thing I know, it's that a hallmark of government officials has been to state the obvious without taking any action to carry out their statement.
Mahathir, just like his successor, promised so much in so many areas. But how much did he actually deliver? He promised to give us a generation of "towering Malays" (wow, is there anyone in this country who would be unhappy with a generation of competent Malays? That was really stating the obvious), and instead we have Malays hobbling on crutches and on the verge of collapsing into wheelchairs, thanks to Mahathir's protectionist policies.
Even more horrifying is when government officials not only state the obvious, but it's clear that the obvious statement runs counter to their actions. So many Ministers, and I believe even the Prime Minister, have insisted that Parliament buck up and take its role as a full-fledged branch of government in itself, acting independently of the executive.
Yet, whose policies are curtailing the independence of our MPs? The policies of the Barisan Nasional regime, that's who. Who suspended two Penang state assemblymen who refused to support a government-backed motion? Mahathir. Who issued an official directive banning MPs from voting for opposition motions? Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. And these same men now lament that Parliament is nothing more than the executive's lapdog!
Look, politicians. Malaysians may not be too intelligent, but we're smart enough to know the obvious. We know corruption is bad. We know our country would be better off with a dynamic and competitive Malay community. We want a cleaner environment. We want a stronger economy. We want strong family values. We want a government that's accountable.
There's zero need to tell us that you want these same things. We believe you want them. That's why you were elected in the first place. The question is, what are you going to do about achieving them? The evidence indicates that you'd rather sit on your ass and pretend to do something, or worse still, actively fight these obvious principles behind the scenes.
Until you pull your act together, the overwhelming evidence is that you are not only betraying these obvious principles held by the Malaysian people, but you are also nothing better than liars and hypocrites. Until there is evidence to the contrary, it will be a cold day in hell before I vote for the Barisan Nasional regime — and I know many people feel the same way about our lying, lackadaisical government.
Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.
Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.
Comments
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)
| Related comments from forum thread "The Malaysian Opposition is Useless": | |
|---|---|
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 953 IP Logged | Posted at 11:20:19 am Aug 28, 2005
Let's look at the opposition parties we have, shall we? Keadilan was created to serve as an outlet for Anwar's numerous political supporters to call for his release. Once Anwar's release was secured, the party lost its way. They have no idea what to do next. Much like most opposition parties, Keadilan was gestated with only the purpose of opposing in mind. None of the major opposition parties have any real plans to tackle the country's issues should they obtain power. Their manifestos extend only as far as opposing the majority of the policies the ruling party currently has in place. Keadilan, much like the DAP, also compromised its values by joining the Barisan Alternatif, which was lambasted by more than a few for being built around Barisan Nasional's communalism (PAS/Keadilan for the Malays, and DAP for the non-Malays). Joining hands with PAS, a purely Malay party (at least in terms of membership) represents a serious compromise of Keadilan's principles, if Keadilan is indeed built on a foundation of multi-ethnic politics. Let's not get confused: I believe it's long been overdue that we do something about communal politics in Malaysia. However, I do not believe it is right to expect the lame duck opposition to get started on this. There is no strong leader among Keadilan or the DAP who can build a solid platform with strong principles. All the current parties have skeletons in their closets as well; the DAP is based on Singapore's PAP, which isn't all that popular here; Keadilan was designed to rescue Anwar, and that was all it was ever meant to be; PAS has the whole Islamic state thing which isn't exactly desirable among many voter; and the BN parties? It's needless to even list down the stigma associated with BN. However, hastily jumping from the frying pan into the fire isn't all too desirable either. Let's not be rash; voting for a party without a plan is just as bad, if not worse, than voting for a party consisting of politicians who plan to steal, but also one or two who actually have a plan once in a while. DAP and Keadilan should stop acting like petty people with nothing better to do than criticise, and lay out a clear roadmap for where they will lead this country if (and hopefully when) they take power. They cannot expect to be opposition forever, for as long as that is all they expect of themselves, that is all the voters will ever expect of them. |
| Last five replies (6 comments not shown): | |
|
freelunch2020
Member Posts: 17 IP Logged | Posted at 12:59:25 pm Mar 5, 2007
"Merging Parti Keadilan Rakyat and the Democratic Action Party" hmmm i think desi and us will just have to agree to disagree. i feel that perhaps turf wars exist in ALL PARTIES including PKR. as it is now as i've posted on my blog, it's Azmin vs Ezam + Syed Husin + Tian. and it's evident from a lot of events, if u become a 'regular' of sorts. u can kinda make out the factions. re DAP internal politics. i've not met anyone or seen for myself so i am not inclined to say anything although LGE has gotten a lot of bad press but he was also the person who stood up for the 15-yr-old girl who was allegedly raped by none other than the chairman of GABEM, Tan Sri Rahim Thamby Chik. LGE's intervention cost him 18 months in jail and being stripped of his professional accountancy qualification. so, john, i suggest we check out the ground and draw our own conclusions. i guess everyone will just have to find the party that suits them. desi will continue to talk about anwar's magical powers while we will continue to point out his and his party's flaws. but i do agree with desi that starting your own party is akin to reinventing the wheel as youth would need to learn from seniors. so being within an existing political party while forming a forward-thinking faction is the way most ppl does it -- even mahathir who was considered a reformist when in his early career. also, a senior politician has advised me to join a party most suitable cos none will be perfect and form a base with like-minded people there. i am really excited about this kabinet rakyat thing. at least it will show that we are not just talking about "brilliant ideas" but doing something. much thanks to nat tan of bangkit who has joined PKR under Tian. |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 953 IP Logged | Posted at 4:08:16 am Mar 6, 2007
The trouble with the opposition is that these turf wars are the main news about them. Of course, the MSM has every reason to play up these turf wars to make the opposition look bad, but even alternative media highlight these things a lot. In other countries with free presses, the media doesn't dig up much dirt on these turf feuds because these parties know how to keep these things quiet and focus on their bigger agenda. It doesn't seem to be the same here. And as for Lim Guan Eng, I think few would question his motives. Like his father, he has gone to jail to stand up for what he believes is right. It's just that perhaps he, like his father, considers himself indispensable to the opposition/DAP. Politics should be about ideas, not people. |
|
kufar
Member Posts: 23 IP Logged | Posted at 9:27:40 pm Mar 13, 2007
Quoted from: johnleemk These "turf wars" are not wrong eventhough you view them as wrong. I for one find "turf wars" as interesting especially as politics is about personalities, characters and not just ideas. Nobody with a brain will vote for a human being who has bad personality like Anwar Ibrahim who is a convicted criminal who went to prison. Also, don't forget Anwar is an immoral man, a practising homosexual. Quoted from: johnleemk Making personal attacks and destroying a character is fun and part of freedom of speech and expression. If you think Parti Keadilan Rakyat supporters worship a man who is corrupt, homosexual and having dictatorial tendencies as their God, we should sterotype all P.K.R. supporters in this way to ruin them. Quoted from: johnleemk Why would any person (except those who are PKR. and PAS propagandists) question the motives of Lim Guan Eng? DAP is the only reputable political party in Malaysia. As for Lim Guan Eng going to jail, he was framed by the Muslim government that held a Kangaroo Court. This Kangaroo Court sentenced the innocent Lim Guan Eng to prison on fabrigated charges. However, with that said, I believe Anwar Ibrahim conviction was true as Anwar was tried before an impartial judge who evaluated all evidence presented by the sound witnesses and finally sentenced the Islamic fascist dictator to jail for corruption. That is why Anwar Ibrahim is banned from contesting the general election until 2008. There is a 5-year ban for those who are convicted of a crime which covers holding positions in any organisation registered under Societies Act, Companies Act or Government (which includes Parliament). Quoted from: johnleemk You fool, politics IS about PEOPLE not just ideas. Political activities are centered around personality (people) and idea (ideology). Nobody who has a brain will vote for the racist Islamic fascist dictator Anwar Ibrahim who must be hung like Saddam Hussein. |
|
kufar
Member Posts: 23 IP Logged | Posted at 10:25:14 pm Mar 13, 2007
Quoted from: freelunch2020 There is nothing wrong in "reinventing the wheel" for even the author of Linux OS reinvented the wheel rather than using Microsoft's Windows OS. Besides, a political party is an organisation based on an ideology that unites people, and in malaysia, all existing parties are _socialist_ either national socialist (ie. PAS, PKR and UMNO) or democratic socialist like the DAP. There are absolutely _no_ Conservative or Liberal political parties, nor any Green political party. Quoted from: freelunch2020 It is impossible to reform PAS, which is a hardline national socialist (Nazi) party that has implemented apartheid in Kelantan towards Chinese. I've spoken to many Chinese living in different areas throughout Kelantan and they all have intense hatred towards PAS and vote every election for Barisan Nasional. UMNO Kota Bahru MP Zaid Ibrahim defeated Barisan Alternatif (which is PAS-led) because he is a non racist. The best parties that exist today are DAP and Barisan Nasional, while the worst parties are Parti Keadilan Rakyat and PAS. A new party must never commit the mistake DAP did in 1999, which was working with PAS. It must colloborate with DAP and Barisan Nasional to fight with Barisan Alternatif but at the same time remain an opposition party (ie stay outside the BN). Quoted from: freelunch2020 Who is this senior politician? What party does s/he belong to? You do need to define "most suitable" so we know exactly what you mean when you use that word. If you ask me what is my political ideology, I would say that every general election I commit myself to strategic voting (tactical voting). My first preference is DAP and second preference is BN. If a parlimentary seat has DAP, I will vote for it regardless of straight fights or 3-cornered fights. If a parliamentary seat has PAS or PKR, I will certainly vote for BN. Quoted from: freelunch2020 There is no such thing as "Kabinet Rakyat" as in all democratic countries such as United Kingdom or New Zealand, the Prime Minister (who is elected by the parliament cabinet) appoints the Cabinet (which makes up the executive branch of government). A Kabinet Rakyat is surely un democratic as direct elections for the Cabinet posts is immoral because a good election has small number of electorate per electoral constituency. Cabinet and Prime Minister MUST follow British standards - be appointed by parliament and that happens now under BN (which has an overhelming two-thirds in the parliament). PKR proposal is a gimmick. They actually want to strip parliament of its power to elect the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. Quoted from: freelunch2020 Nat Tan is a nut case and that is why he is called "Nat" (nut). bangkit.net and jelas.info are pro-PAS web sites, which prove that Mr Nut Case (aka Nataniel Tan Chee Bhai) is an Islamic fascist. He must be hung in the gallows publically like Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. |
|
cyrix
Member Posts: 5 IP Logged | Posted at 8:30:23 pm Mar 21, 2007
LKS actually brought up the possibility of a merger sometime after the 2004 elections but the proposal was shot down by PKR. Why? Because right now for the merger to go ahead, the onus is on PKR to agree with it. It was PKR's insecurities which was the reason for its rejection of any merger proposals. PKR and Anwar wants to be the main Opposition party, but their current election performance is an obstacle to that, since it only has 1 seat while DAP has 12. Can we blame LKS and LGE if they disagree that PKR should be the 'senior merger-partner' if DAP is currently so much more successful election-wise compared to PKR? So I think that this is what must happen before a merger is feasible. Firstly, PKR must concentrate more on taking on UMNO in those rural/semi-rural Malay seats, instead of those urban-Chinese seats. Sure, its much easier for Opposition parties, especially the secular ones to win in those seats, but it doesn't help strengthen PKR's barganing power in the event of a PKR-DAP merger. If PKR can show DAP that it is capable to winning those vital Malay-majority seats, then only will DAP start considering letting Anwar lead them. So that's why I think that the next election is of utmost importance to PKR in terms of their future survival, merger with DAP, and of Anwar leading the Opposition. |
