Infernal Ramblings
A Malaysian Perspective on Politics, Society and Economics

A True Malaysian Leader

Written by johnleemk on 12:36:18 am May 10, 2007.
Categories:

Not too long ago on a discussion forum, the subject of discrimination against non-Bumiputras came up. One commentor suggested a campaign along the lines of the American civil rights movement in the 1960s to overthrow this sham regime of equality, and bring about a fairer Malaysian society.

Now, I was once very captivated by this idea of a civil rights movement. The image of blacks sitting in white-only restaurants for hours, either until they were served or the restaurants closed, is a profoundly stirring one, and makes you wonder why this can't be accomplished here.

Of course, one is quickly disabused of this idealistic notion once we realise that Malaysians are probably the most apathetic people in the whole world. But still, after some reflection, I think there is actually some merit in the idea of a Malaysian civil rights movement.

However, there are some very important hurdles that have to be crossed before this movement can even begin to take off. The first is making this a Malaysian civil rights movement, supported by all ethnic communities. The second, and most important, is finding the requisite leaders for this Malaysian movement.

Some might see the first problem as the most pressing and perhaps most difficult to solve, because although gathering support among the ethnic minorities for such a movement would be relatively easy, persuading the Malays/Bumiputras to give up their privileged position would be much harder.

However, I believe that it can be done. As one Malay commentator aptly observed, all he got from his Bumiputra privileges was "two bags of manure". Most Bumiputra privileges are available only for the very people who don't need them.

That's why the solution is an expanded New Economic Policy that cuts the rich Bumis out of the picture, and brings all poor Malaysians into the picture. It will still not be a cakewalk getting Malays on board, but it won't be as difficult as some people might think.

A more pressing issue would be getting the Malay middle class involved, because these are the people best-placed to take advantage of these privileges, but also the people best-placed to topple the discriminatory regime currently in place.

Now, this is why everything basically boils down to leadership. What we really need, what our country really needs, is a charismatic and daring leader who can move Malaysians to action.

Of course Malaysians have been apathetic to date. How can they not be, when our leadership is so uninspiring? Does listening to Abdullah Ahmad Badawi speak make your heart brim with love for your country? Do listening to Lim Kit Siang's or Anwar Ibrahim's fiery speeches make you feel that something has to be done to right the injustices in our country?

The problem with our leaders today is that they are either incapable of rousing the masses, have a too tainted reputation to be credible, or both (as is the case with many government leaders).

We have not got a single leader with the credibility and the charisma to move people to action. What do we have? People who mouth the word "perubahan" so uninspiringly that they could put you to sleep.

Why did the Americans not have a civil rights movement in the 1930s or 1950s? Why did it take until the 1960s for their movement to really take off? Because it was the 1960s when they got leaders with the charisma and credentials to unite Americans against the discrimination of their society.

In the 1960s, the Americans were practically swimming in powerful leaders. They were blessed with two presidents who refused to tolerate the economic and social injustices of their society, and powerful orators like Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy.

The basic problem with the Malaysian opposition and the Malaysian civil rights movement (or what may become the civil rights movement) is that we don't have even one leader like these men. Lim Kit Siang is basically a Chinese leader, not a Malaysian leader, whatever the Democratic Action Party might say — and it does not seem that his successor (whoever that may be, though it presently seems to be his son) will be any different.

Meanwhile, Anwar has the charisma, and could be a Malaysian leader, but his major stumbling block is credibility. Any trust the Malaysian people may have had in him is now in tatters after his stint in power — Anwar politicised the education system, was almost as nepotic as Mahathir, and to make things worse, he has never apologised for these errors. He thus cannot move more than his few hardcore supporters to action, because he does not have the moral high ground to do so.

Now, since we are so lacking in leaders, the onus is on Malaysians to search ourselves and the people we know for who has the charisma and credibility to lead any campaign for change.

The requirements are not necessarily complicated. At the barest minimum, this leader should be capable of brilliant oration in both Malay and English — although ideally Mandarin and Tamil as well (but truly, I will happily eat my cap if there is such a person out there in the country). Race is not really important — if the fellow can communicate well, racial perceptions will not count as much. The Malays will trust someone who can talk to and relate with them; they are in the end, still essentially human.

It's really communication that is the important thing. The reason we need leaders with charisma and credibility is because otherwise, their message won't stick — won't have staying power.

We need a leader who can paint the injustices of our society in stark and glaring colours. We need a leader who can paint a future for our country which is leaps and bounds better than anything presently conceivable. We need a leader who can passionately speak about how we can right these wrongs and reach out for that future.

This is the kind of visionary leader that the American civil rights movement had — and that united blacks and whites all over the United States against the discrimination of their society. And this is the kind of visionary leader that Malaysians need if we are to have a grassroots movement to change our country for the better.

This is not the kind of leader we can currently find anywhere in our elected legislatures, nor is it the one we can find in the upper echelons of our political parties. If we are to find this kind of leader, it will be in the grassroots — it will be just another Tom, Dick or Harry who realises something is wrong with our country, and that he has the passion and power to communicate the nature of these wrongs and how to right them.

I believe we can find these leaders. There are at least 25 million people in Malaysia, not counting all the Malaysians currently overseas. The leaders we need are out there. The question is, can we find them before it is too late? The time is now to spread the word, and to reach out to everyone we know, to look for the people who may tomorrow change this country for the better.

This is not a task we can afford to leave to the politicians or to the political parties. This is a task for every Malaysian who loves his country, who knows something is wrong with it, who knows something has to be done. If we do not find the leaders we need, change — and thus our country itself — is as good as dead.


If you'd like to keep informed about updates to the site, consider subscribing to our web feed:

Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.

Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.


Comments

Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)

Related comments from forum thread "BOYCOTT BOYCOTT BOYCOTT - The desperate cry of a no-win situ":
freelunch2020
Member
Posts: 17
IP Logged

Posted at 2:23:04 pm Jan 15, 2007
Hi John,

Thanks so much for the invite to discuss this topic. Very well written article on the opposition's decision to 'boycott' the Batu Talam by-election. Again, it's a pleasure to be discussing such issues with a young but superbly talented man like you -- you have a bright future --> MIGRATE TO THE US or UK. :D They give you a passport with full rights after 10 years. :D

Anyway back to the topic, I agree with you that the opposition should have just come out and said that "they would prefer to concentrate their resources on the upcoming general elections" instead of riding the moral high horse of principles.

From my observation in the past 20 years, the main obstacle that the opposition faces in a fair election lies NOT in the electoral process BUT in their lack of ACCESS to the mainstream media.

Like you and many others have said, public opinion is largely formed by the mass media, especially in rural areas where the level of education and hence critical thinking is generally lacking.

Hence, the government is able to hold on to the votes mainly because they are able to control public opinion.

Generally, besides the gerrymandering over the years that have swayed the electoral process to BN's benefit, the electoral process is pretty fair -- just look at PAS in Kelantan and Terengganu. If it was really that dirty, dirty nonetheless, but clean enough for voters to elect their representative of choice.

The opposition faces a gargantuan task with its lack of resources, intimidation from authorities, non-access to the mainstream media, and MOSTLY the almost complete ABSENCE of credible, passionate and effective leaders with a CLEAR MANIFESTO, like you mentioned.

PAS seems unable to shake off it's image of an Islamic party still living in a medieval Middle East and hoping that a piety will solve all their material problems. But I do respect the party because it has integrity and its leaders appear to have stronger sense of public service -- something that those in BN can learn from.

After Anwar's re-entry into full-time politics, PKR has improved in its vision with a strong focus on civil society, espousing all those values associated with it. But besides Anwar and Azmin Ali, I fail to see any other leader who would be able to take on the challenge of a general election. The party was thrashed in 2004 with many stories of incompetence and insufficient party workers to push their candidates' campaign. So, the problem with PKR lies with leadership and membership.

My assessment of Tian Chua is that he is a good ACTIVIST but may not be as good a POLITICIAN. Politics, especially since you want to govern, is more than STAGING PROTESTS. These activities should be relegated to the younger student leaders. Especially in Malaysia, demonstrations are viewed as ineffective means of bringing change and a disruption to public life. Can you think of any policy changes that demonstrations have brought? What has the demonstrations on toll hikes and fuel hikes done? Even the mass turnout of over 10,000 people during the height of Anwar's reformasi campaign in 1998 FAILED to TOPPLE Dr M. This proves that the Malaysian way is not the 'demonstrasi way'.

So, PKR needs to recruit more leaders across demographics and party workers, who are more aware of REAL POLITICS not social activism.

Back to the move to boycott, I've mentioned on my blog, I feel this is POLITICALLY the best thing to do. Since they are going to lose based on past elections, they might as well capitalise on it by asking for improvements in the electoral process.

On whether international media attention will cause any change, my view is a definite NO. Like you said, just look at Myanmar + Anwar. But now with the FTA negotiations, there may be a stronger impetus for the government to maintain its facade of democracy and civil society.

In conclusion, it is my view that the move is good politically but fails to hold up on the grounds of an 'unfair and dirty' electoral process as the main hurdle to a fair election is the opposition's non-participation in the mainstream mass media.

:D let me know. i could not find a topic so just started one. :D we should meet sometime, will u be going to the talk on wed night with Kadir Jasin et al on the NST-Utusan merger? Check Jeff Ooi.
Last five replies (0 comments not shown):
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind
Head Administrator
Posts: 948
IP Logged
Posted at 2:17:38 am Jan 16, 2007
They give you a passport with full rights after 10 years.
Haha, I'll think about it...I'd like to keep my Malaysian citizenship for the time being, though.

Hence, the government is able to hold on to the votes mainly because they are able to control public opinion.
Yes, exactly. If the opposition wants to win, they must change public opinion. Even under a completely fair electoral system, BN would still be in power today, albeit with a lower majority. I'd say the real unfair laws are those clamping down on free speech, and the chilling effect that goes with them. I have seen people, making a blog post slightly critical of government policy for the first time in their lives, wondering if they'll get in trouble with the special branch. Without a free press, the government has a field day in manipulating public opinion.

It will be difficult, however, to change these laws at any rate, especially because there is - in some limited sense - a real justification for them. (Ostensibly "sensitive issues".) What we need is real grassroots support for the opposition. Only that will sweep them into power. Since the government has cut off conventional avenues of expression, the opposition has to rely on the strength of its message, platform and candidates, and word of mouth (word of mouth naturally includes alternative media such as blogs).

PAS seems unable to shake off it's image of an Islamic party still living in a medieval Middle East and hoping that a piety will solve all their material problems. But I do respect the party because it has integrity and its leaders appear to have stronger sense of public service -- something that those in BN can learn from.
Yes, that is the only reason I am not utterly disgusted with PAS - at least their leaders seem to stand for something. The only problem is the utter incompetency of many of their leaders, and the utter unviability of their platform.

After Anwar's re-entry into full-time politics, PKR has improved in its vision with a strong focus on civil society, espousing all those values associated with it. But besides Anwar and Azmin Ali, I fail to see any other leader who would be able to take on the challenge of a general election. The party was thrashed in 2004 with many stories of incompetence and insufficient party workers to push their candidates' campaign. So, the problem with PKR lies with leadership and membership.
100% agreement there. I am always wondering why these political parties find it so difficult to locate competent leaders. True visionaries, yes, might be hard to find. But competent people, Malay or otherwise, are not hard to find at all. Indeed, there is probably a surplus for the taking since UMNO/MCA/MIC have been promoting incompetent corrupt ba*****s all these years. It is sad that the opposition continually fails to capitalise on bright potential leaders.

My assessment of Tian Chua is that he is a good ACTIVIST but may not be as good a POLITICIAN. Politics, especially since you want to govern, is more than STAGING PROTESTS. These activities should be relegated to the younger student leaders. Especially in Malaysia, demonstrations are viewed as ineffective means of bringing change and a disruption to public life. Can you think of any policy changes that demonstrations have brought? What has the demonstrations on toll hikes and fuel hikes done? Even the mass turnout of over 10,000 people during the height of Anwar's reformasi campaign in 1998 FAILED to TOPPLE Dr M. This proves that the Malaysian way is not the 'demonstrasi way'.
Haha, indeed. I have noticed that at most recent demonstrations, the PKR flag is the most prominent. While it is good that they are involving themselves in grassroots-level activities, if these cannot translate into greater support for the party or its policies, they must find other ways of gaining ground.

Back to the move to boycott, I've mentioned on my blog, I feel this is POLITICALLY the best thing to do. Since they are going to lose based on past elections, they might as well capitalise on it by asking for improvements in the electoral process.
Hehe, my sentiments are similar. At the same time, though, if their true motive is tactically-based, I think it's a bit disingenuous to call it a "boycott". :p

But now with the FTA negotiations, there may be a stronger impetus for the government to maintain its facade of democracy and civil society.
I'm skeptical about this. Singapore is a bastion of free trade, and they didn't have a single opposition MP till the mid-1980s, and the government frequently wins elections on nomination day. There were all those scandals about their mistreatment of opposition candidates in the last GE (with lawsuits, etc. flying about) and with their small contained "free speech zones" at a recent summit, but none of these have dampened investor interest or made foreign governments skeptical of Singapore. If BN can maintain Malaysia's facade as a well-governed country, foreigners generally won't care how messed up our politics are.

In conclusion, it is my view that the move is good politically but fails to hold up on the grounds of an 'unfair and dirty' electoral process as the main hurdle to a fair election is the opposition's non-participation in the mainstream mass media.
IMO, it is very impractical to enter the mainstream mass media because of the vast amount of capital required to run a newspaper (not to mention the government would probably delay the process of granting a licence forever), and at any rate a non-independent newspaper might not be very credible. (Though obviously that hasn't daunted the party-owned newspapers such as The Star or the NST.) It's practically impossible to gain space in any mainstream newspaper because it's either BN-owned or fearful of losing its licence (the chilling effect, as I said). And let's not even talk about radio or TV... :p

let me know. i could not find a topic so just started one. we should meet sometime, will u be going to the talk on wed night with Kadir Jasin et al on the NST-Utusan merger? Check Jeff Ooi.
Sure, anyone can start a new topic - that's how forums thrive, because unlike conventional blogs, anyone can start a new discussion topic. I don't think I can attend, since I don't have any transport. Maybe desi should organise another bloggers' meet one of these days...


Latest:
A New Malaysian Government May Be On Its Way
Popular:
Change From Within? Not Likely

Most Recently Read

  1. Absolute vs Comparative Advantage
  2. Realising an Independent Nation in Malaysia
  3. Anwar and Altantuya, Twin Miscarriages of Justice
  4. A Malay Male Slams Malaysian Malaysia and the Opposition
  5. A New Malaysian Government May Be On Its Way
  6. Malaysia Has No Parliament
  7. Wise Taxation
  8. God Can't Be (Dis)Proven
  9. Facebook, the King of Social Networks
  10. Sunset Clauses Keep Temporary Laws Temporary
Google
Latest active forum topics
Quoth the webserver...
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
— William Pitt the Younger
Poll
Sorry, only registered users may vote. Please register or login.

There are currently no polls running.