If You Read One Book About Malaysian Politics...
I have read a great number of books about Malaysian politics and history; some clearly lowbrow, while others have been aimed at an intellectual audience. Although all have made some impact on me, the one which I believe has had the greatest influence is The Malay Dilemma Revisited by Bakri Musa.
Bakri's accomplishment in this book is his articulation of sentiments which every thinking Malaysian feels, but few are capable of expressing. A number of things Bakri writes have the propensity of making you slap your forehead wondering why you hadn't realised this particular insight before.
Unlike many books which deal with roughly the same ideas, The Malay Dilemma Revisited is not an intellectual book. It has the requisite bibliography, and is obviously the work of a well-educated man, but its writing style is colloquial and the ideas are expressed in simple language.
At the same time, it is very apparent that Bakri is not writing for the masses. The poor standard of English education in Malaysia makes his book inaccessible to a vast majority of Malaysians, and not all of his ideas can be easily understood without some appropriate background.
Bakri's obvious audience is thus the Malaysian middle class — the kind of person who is educated enough to comprehend English, but not an academic intellectual who would think it beneath her to read a work without footnotes or significant references to established sociological theories.
The Malay Dilemma Revisited is grounded very firmly in the consistent application of common sense to Malaysian politics and government. To Bakri, there are no sacred cows; almost every topic he touches on is controversial to some extent.
The scope of the book is very broad, dealing with almost every topic imaginable. As its title suggests, it is meant as something of a rebuttal to Mahathir Mohamad's The Malay Dilemma — which Bakri considers to have unfairly denigrated the Malay race by reinforcing negative stereotypes of Malays being innately lazy, stupid, and unable to compete with other ethnic communities.
However, using this critique as a starting base, Bakri branches out, dealing with issues as far-ranging as corruption, party politics and education. Refraining from the extremist views of some commentators, Bakri takes an evenhanded approach, and (some might say) even assumes a very optimistic viewpoint by writing as if his sharp criticisms would be used by the Malaysian government to improve and adjust its policies.
Bakri's book encapsulates perfectly the somewhat paradoxical view I have adopted when it comes to Malaysia's future. The Malay Dilemma Revisited points out the faults and errors in almost every quarter of government policy — there is a dash of pessimism — but goes on to propose solutions for these problems, and takes an optimistic opinion that we can change Malaysia for the better.
It is impossible to summarise Bakri's incisive views, considering how broadly and deeply he tackles Malaysia's problems. I wish I could summarise them, because they are worth it — they should be read by every Malaysian who cares about his or her country, because of just how unique they are and just how brilliantly they state the misgivings many Malaysians have about where their country is headed.
The uniqueness of The Malay Dilemma Revisited lies in its vision of optimism for the country's future. Many opposition politicians and activists have gotten into the habit of negativism — they are very negative about the government and the ruling regime, which is perfectly justified, but their cynicism is so overwhelming, it is difficult to view them as anything more than an anti-Barisan Nasional farce.
The only cause for optimism they offer is "We won't be BN!" — they have failed completely at presenting a vision for Malaysia's future that goes beyond "Not having BN!" Many opposition politicians have not been entirely happy with my somewhat pessimistic views on our future if the opposition can't be more optimistic, but the main reason I am so frustrated is that a simple Malay doctor has been able to write an astounding articulation of Malaysia's problems and how to solve them, while the opposition have been making anti-BN posters and chanting "reformasi".
What Bakri has to offer in The Malay Dilemma Revisited is a reflection on Malaysia's past, and a vision for Malaysia's future if we can correct the mistakes of the past. This uniquely sets his work apart from many other books, which offer only introspection on our history, or unrealistic visions of either unstinting rose-tinted optimism or gloom and doom.
If you want to understand why so many people are worried about our country's future, if you want to gain a deeper comprehension of your own hopes and fears for where Malaysia is headed, if you want to know how things can improve, there is one book I recommend that is head and shoulders above anything else — Bakri Musa's The Malay Dilemma Revisited. It is the one book that every Malaysian with a heart and mind should read.
Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.
Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.
Comments
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)
| Related comments from forum thread "Toppling UMNO/BN: An Agenda for Change": | |
|---|---|
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 949 IP Logged | Posted at 11:11:00 am Aug 28, 2005
UPDATE: More on this proposed party can be found in the replies below. Okay, it's pretty much clear now that politics in Malaysia cannot move forward without real multiracial parties, an unbiased media (or at least, a media consisting of many people with different biases for balance) and a decent opposition that has a plan, a direction, and some principles it will adhere to and not compromise on for a little more power. A lot of bloggers at other sites seem rather pumped up about brainstorming ways to achieve these aims, but the most they end up doing is talking about talking how to reform the government/opposition. So, if you please, I'd like to have a real discussion on how to reform Malaysian politics. (Although I'm quite pessimistic we'll see much change in our lifetime; the most we can do is plant the seeds for the next generation to reap; right now, the existing generation of adults is simply too set in their ways to change much.) I propose the formation of a new political party. A party that is for the people, of the people and by the people. A party where the little man can speak and know what he says can have a real impact on his daily life. The elite of our country cannot form this party. They have no interest in promoting change. This party has to come from the middle class. The middle class has a latent but large amount of resources - physical, mental and intellectual. All this will go to waste if we continue to stay at the periphery and let the big guys squabble for the right to ride the gravy train. On the other hand, the poor are incapable of promoting much change because of their low resources. Even if they have intellectual brainpower, it has not been developed much due to their little capital available for educational purposes. It is up to those of us, those of the middle class, to step into the breach and save our country. Malaysia is falling apart. Nobody can deny that. Peek into the pages of any newspaper, even the NST or Berita Harian. There is ample evidence that if we maintain the status quo - and doubtless, UMNO and BN intend to maintain it - Malaysia will die a slow and agonising death. We have a country built on division and corruption. Either we tear it down and rebuild a magnificent edifice we can be proud of, a building to rival the veritable skyscraper of Singapore, or we let our dilapidated gilded hut of a country rot and collapse fifty to a hundred years from now. It's up to the middle class to promote change. It's in our interest, and in the interest of every Malaysian, rich or poor. |
| Last five replies (35 comments not shown): | |
|
marvin
Member Posts: 6 IP Logged | Posted at 3:50:44 pm Jan 27, 2007
Grads in Malaysia are a hopeless bunch. Judging by how the education is being handled, there's no wonder why the end results are usually lame and half witted. No doubt we have intelligent young people who are either visionary or charismatic. But we lack people who have the combination of both and more importantly young people who are idealistic. Idealism is the most important essence to a revolution. Your idea of a Malaysian utopia needs a revolution to be realized. The public in Malaysia do not possess ideological sense because they don't read, they follow their leader, specifically today, it's their feudal lords. Capitalism, socialism, nobody understands that. What's more important to them is to ensure they would live comfortably for another day. A charismatic figure, who is idealized, who is extreme in his belief, who relates to the public, who makes the public think, so like him, they can foresee the gloomy future. This charismatic figure, because of his idealistic nature, risks to lose everything if he doesn't succeed. You know, like an ol' Senor Ernesto Guevara minus the marxism and guerilla side. Unless the BN government really plunder the nation like Ferdinand Marcos did Philipines, it's unlikely that a generation of this sort idealist would be born. But certainly not impossible. Best case scenario, a new libertarian socialist party led by a Malay. Party is anti statist, anti royalist, anti feudal, secularized and headed towards decentralized government. People may not be prepared for the party's ideology but supports it because they believe in the leaders and believe that without a change, the country will dwindle into a state of carcass. Ultimately only that ONE person is needed and the rest will follow suit. I'm inspired by the writings in the Republic Of Virtue by Dr Azly Abdul Rahman. Is it likely? |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 949 IP Logged | Posted at 4:55:02 am Jan 28, 2007
I agree that there is a dearth of grads with idealism and ability - but at the same time, they are not non-existent. I am also essentially optimistic about the ability of the brainwashed populace to cast off the shackles of BN - provided there is an opposition party which can show how ably it will govern the country, and knows its stuff. As Khairy noted in his opinion piece, the opposition has always been incompetently running on a platform of not being BN, instead of a positive policy platform for change. If the people truly believe they will have a better future under a new government, they will vote for it. That is why I agree that "Ultimately only that ONE person is needed and the rest will follow suit". The important thing is that the idealists and intellectuals should not be shackled by their ideologies and be able to handle politics. Many social activists in PKR are idealistic, but they cannot really fight for political power because all they know how to do is hold demonstrations. Similarly, intellectuals who are too detached from reality will never be able to compete politically. |
|
tanstaafl
Member Posts: 9 IP Logged | Posted at 10:31:06 am Jan 28, 2007
Being 15, you can take the long view and personally, I believe that's the right approach to take given the circumstances provided those currently in power don't cut this off at the knees before you get anywhere or some other events occur before meaningful change is achieved. I concur with your conclusion that a new party is needed for the reasons that you have clearly set out so I won't re-hash them. Insofar as the list of goals are concerned, I would like to add a couple more - Separation of State & Religion - might require a change to the constitution? Separation of Politics from Business - which I've always felt eventually leads to corruption For funding is concerned, I believe that the only viable sources locally are amongst the middle class professionals. Most of the so-called corporate tycoons will have no interest in supporting a party that seeks to upset the status quo and their own livelihoods. Incidentally, I suggest a change of name to this topic. The current one is too narrowly focussed. How about "Proposals for Political & Social Reform"? |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 949 IP Logged | Posted at 12:08:50 pm Jan 28, 2007
Separation of State & Religion - might require a change to the constitution?It depends on how far you want to go. Personally, I think we'll never succeed at getting Islam removed as the official religion, and I'm not sure we even want to go there. Rather, the focus should be on restoring the original intent of the Constitution, which was merely to permit some Islamic rituals at official functions (e.g. doa) without making Malaysia an Islamic state. (Tunku Abdul Rahman himself said this when speaking in Parliament in defence of the practice of serving alcohol at government functions.) Separation of Politics from Business - which I've always felt eventually leads to corruptionThis is something I agree with, but it is difficult to hammer down specifics about this. Even the most advanced democracies in the world haven't been able to tackle this problem, so unless we can come up with something innovative, I'm not sure it'd even be worth trying to do more than address this on a somewhat ad hoc basis. (That's pretty much how the Americans handled the Jack Abramoff scandal when Abramoff, a professional lobbyist, was caught bribing politicians.) For funding is concerned, I believe that the only viable sources locally are amongst the middle class professionals. Most of the so-called corporate tycoons will have no interest in supporting a party that seeks to upset the status quo and their own livelihoods.I agree. I think it would be actually possible to subsist on a similar budget to that of, say, the DAP. The DAP/PKR actually have a lot of potential despite their limited resources - it's just that they haven't been very effective since the DAP is constantly plagued by infighting while PKR has been focusing too much on social activism. Deployed appropriately, their limited resources could probably pose a serious threat to the government, since they've already been regularly winning about 30 to 40% of the popular vote. Incidentally, I suggest a change of name to this topic. The current one is too narrowly focussed. How about "Proposals for Political & Social Reform"?Hm, true...but the name of the topic has a certain bite to it. Maybe I'll change it to "Toppling UMNO/BN: An Agenda for Change". |
|
tanstaafl
Member Posts: 9 IP Logged | Posted at 1:50:27 pm Jan 28, 2007
State & Religion - on second thoughts, this is a tricky one As far as separation of State and Business is concerned, let's go back to the fundamentals and agree that it is not OK for political parties to own businesses or to channel government contracts and projects to those businesses, cap contributions, blacklist / prohibit companies in which elected officials or their families have an indirect interest from participating in any government projects extending up to a period of up to 5 years after ceasing to be an elected official. Hell, I'd even be happy if people would actually react to some of this crap instead of just saying "oh, that's how we do business in Malaysia". Hard to reform when patronage is institutionalised :P |
