Infernal Ramblings
A Malaysian Perspective on Politics, Society and Economics

Anwar Worship: The Wrong Track

Written by johnleemk on 9:27:18 am Jun 5, 2005.
Categories:

Anwar Ibrahim, the former Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia, has been upheld by many parties as a righteous man capable of taking the helm and steering Malaysia towards a brighter future. His violent arrest and detention, they say, is only proof that this man who supposedly endangers the Malaysian status quo of corruption and communalism posed a serious threat towards the ruling government's hegemony. Unfortunately, this hype appears to have obscured the true facts about Anwar and his supposedly capable leadership.

First of all, Anwar as education minister implemented a hopelessly useless moral education program. The fellow even had the cheek to declare that it would inculcate Islamic values in non-Muslim students, as if Malaysians could not be morally upright without being Muslim. But more than that, the implementation has been disastrous. Some of the most dishonest and immoral people I know can get As for Moral Education without breaking a sweat. The grading is far too geared towards an academic one-off test of what you "know" about morals.

In the first place, the syllabus itself assumes there can be only one definition of morals, and only a limited few ways of practising them. That is all that is tested; one definition of a moral value, and a few ways of practising moral values. If the wording is off just a little bit, you lose marks. If when presented with a situation of someone owning up to a mistake, and you name the moral value as trustworthiness instead of honesty, you lose marks. And we're supposed to believe a minister who creates this ridiculous subject can run a country?

People point to Anwar's exposure of Mahathir's cronyism and corruption, and the mass protests he led, as proof that Anwar can put a stop to the endless money politics and bribery ominpresent wherever the word "government" is attached. I, for one, am not convinced. After all, didn't Mahathir out Anwar as well at the UMNO general assembly? Anwar is as guilty as Mahathir when it comes to playing the corruption game. And just what caused his change of heart? Why, the fact that he's no longer in power! Are we going to entrust the management of our country to this man?

His Islamism does not bode well either. In a multicultural and multiethnic nation such as Malaysia, a man who has no qualms about joining forces with a political party that has set its goal as turning Malaysia into an Islamic state with laws preventing the mixing of genders in public is not a man I want running the country.

Why on earth is everyone in the opposition crowding around Anwar to cheer him on, then? I simply cannot fathom the answer to this question. Anwar is incompetent and unfit to rule. People like to bash the book, 50 Reasons Why Anwar Ibrahim Cannot Become Prime Minister of Malaysia, but fail to realise that some, if not most, of the allegations there are true. Take reason 37, for example: "Anwar Ibrahim only holds a degree in Malay Studies from University Malaya. He failed the first year. As such, he has no idea at all about business and economy. He cannot be relied upon to administer the country’s finances." Is anyone denying this?

"Ah," people say, "but all the UMNO politicians are just like that too!" In that case, allow me to straighten things out: Mohammad Mahathir: Cronyist, Islamist leader, and medical doctor. Bad. Anwar Ibrahim: Cronyist, Islamist, and Malay Studies graduate. Good. Somehow, I don't get the picture here.

Of course, some of the charges lobbed against Anwar are simply ridiculous, such as reason 46: "Anwar was recorded squatting down while eating in public and even used chopsticks while eating with the Prime Minister." Nevertheless, focusing on them avoids the painful truth: Anwar is not fit to be running this country. Nor, for that matter, are most of the ruling party's politicians. Even so, the reality is, Anwar cannot be placed on a pedestal nor hailed for his proficient governance. While given the chance to lead, he led Malaysia through disastrous policies, and when ousted, used whatever means he had to attempt to regain power, including playing the anti-corruption card. Anwar is not fit to be Prime Minister of Malaysia.


If you'd like to keep informed about updates to the site, consider subscribing to our web feed:

Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.

Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.


Comments

Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)

Related comments from forum thread "Anwar Ibrahim - Potential PM or Plain Loser?":
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind
Head Administrator
Posts: 948
IP Logged

Posted at 12:47:57 pm Jul 15, 2005
What do you think of Anwar? Is he a great man who got the boot for revolting against Mahathir, or is he just a loser who turned against UMNO only because he was no longer on the gravy train of juicy contracts?

(A longer critique of Anwar is available below, and a general criticism of the opposition is also available in this forum.)
Last five replies (17 comments not shown):
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind
Head Administrator
Posts: 948
IP Logged
Posted at 10:47:02 am Sep 7, 2005
But Anwar was not only convicted by a court for corruption
I think that's hardly a fair assessment, even though I'm no fan of Anwar. The judicial system in Malaysia is under heavy influence from the executive branch. Nevertheless, I think there's more than enough anecdotal evidence that both Anwar and Mahathir were up to their neck in corruption.
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind
Head Administrator
Posts: 948
IP Logged
Posted at 1:01:43 pm Sep 28, 2005
Malaysia Today, a generally pro-Anwar news site, has just published this:
http://www.malaysia-today.net/Blog-e/2005/09/perils-of-pro-malay-policies.htm

And it says...

Not long after Dr. Mahathir's protégé, Anwar Ibrahim, had replaced Mr. Daim as finance minister in 1991, he too was mired in controversy. Mr. Anwar was alleged to have practiced patronage, not to enrich himself, but to develop his power base in UMNO by creating his own breed of politicians-cum-businessmen to accelerate his rapid ascent up the party hierarchy. The use of money in UMNO elections subsequently intensified, creating what Dr. Mahathir later called a "culture of greed."

Although Dr. Mahathir and Messrs. Anwar and Daim all exercised control over the distribution of government concessions, the different reasons why they selectively patronized businessmen had a significant bearing on corporate Malaysia. Since Mr. Anwar's allies were politicians who had ventured into business principally to fund their political activities, their style of business was less productive, with many of them showing little capacity to build on their concessions. No Malay businessman linked to Mr. Anwar emerged as a major corporate figure by 1998, when he was sacked as deputy prime minister.

More proof Anwar is incapable of being trusted to lead our country.
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind
Head Administrator
Posts: 948
IP Logged
Posted at 5:58:17 am Dec 12, 2005
Interesting letter in today's Malaysiakini.
cyrix
Member
Posts: 5
IP Logged
Posted at 12:02:26 am Dec 14, 2005
Quoted from: rakyat
Don't be clouded by the character assassination, what is impt is not the personality or sexual preference but his vision and where he plans to steer the country. Yes, many thing said bout AI might b true but we r only using him to break the hegemony & not 2 b our role model or father figure.

I agree with rakyat on this. It's all very nice to romanticise about politics and hope for the emergence of a noble political saviour to appear, but until that happens, one must confront the unpleasent reality that we face and work with what we have. Since Anwar, due more to his bad luck more than his convictions and principles, is now pushed into forming the Malay-based multiracial PKR to take on BN/UMNO, and he has promised a more civil and fairer society, why shouldn't we give him a chance to do so? What have we got to lose? Like what rakyat said, many people support Anwar not because we think he's a great role model or anything, its solely because, like it or not(in my case, NOT), he's the dude with the best potential to break BN's hegemony in M'sian politics. If he does get into power, and he breaks every promise he made, so what? Is that so different from what BN's doing right now? We could then just vote in BN in the next general elections.

It has already 48 years since we've gained Independence. In that space, how many prominent Malay leaders have snubbed UMNO and joined or formed multiracial parties? Check out this great article written by Dr Chandra Muzaffar on Malay-based political parties through the ages herehttp://www.aliran.com/high9912a.htm for more info.

In the hisory of Malaysian politics, there have only been 3 Malay leaders that were un-UMNO:

1. Dato Onn Jaafar - Independence for Malaya Party, Parti Negara
2. Dr Syed Husin Ali - Parti Rakyat Malaysia (PRM)
3. Abdul Aziz Ishak - National Convention Party (NCP)

Two more have almost no credibility and did so not because of their convictions, but solely with the aim of regaining lost power after failed leadership challenges:

1. Anwar Ibrahim - PKR
2. Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah - Semangat 46

With this track record after almost half a century, I think you'll be quite hard press to get a political saviour anytime soon in the near future.
NightHawk
Member
Posts: 187
IP Logged
Posted at 4:27:36 am Feb 21, 2006
whos cryix?


Latest:
Change From Within? Not Likely
Popular:
An Exercise in Reciprocal Tolerance

Most Recently Read

  1. Absolute vs Comparative Advantage
  2. Civil Law and Common Law
  3. Reform Malaysian Education at the Basic Levels
  4. Global Warming, True or False, Has No Bearing on the Environmental Question
  5. Economic Class and Education in Malaysia
  6. Ridiculosity in the Lina Joy Decision
  7. In the Slow Lane: Toll Policy
  8. Does Culture Matter?
  9. Girl, Your Marginal Benefit Is Far Greater Than Your Marginal Cost
  10. Legalising Nudity?
Google
Latest active forum topics
Quoth the webserver...
May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.
— Dwight D. Eisenhower
Poll
Sorry, only registered users may vote. Please register or login.

There are currently no polls running.