Unwarranted Religious Paranoia, Courtesy of Fundamentalism
One thing I have never understood about religious fundamentalists of any ilk is why they have to be so paranoid. It is as if that if they let people do as they wish, the world will collapse — if they cannot coerce people into following the one true faith, then we are all doomed.
Take, for example, Christian fundamentalists in the United States. They have nothing better to do than to pressure their government to insert its nose where it does not belong and put Christianity in the public sphere.
Worse still, they stand for oppressive laws which ban behaviour they consider "immoral". They conveniently forget that the Bible condemns homosexuality and adultery in the same breath (and if I recall correctly, only one of these is mentioned in the Ten Commandments — and it isn't sodomy); why is homosexuality sufficiently immoral for the government to ban it, but not adultery?
(Indeed, adultery is probably more harmful than sodomy, since adultery breaks up the nuclear family while at the worst homosexuality only means parents and siblings don't get along.)
At their worst, these fundamentalists actually go out and murder homosexuals and doctors who work at abortion clinics. (How ironic, considering Jesus told us to "turn the other cheek" when slapped so our enemies could have a second go.)
This paranoia has unfortunately hit Malaysian shores with the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. Increasingly, we see Muslims who pick and choose what their holy book tells them, and insist on the government enforcing laws which are only God's to enforce.
There is one prominent Muslim fundamentalist blogger who once complained about a Christian church's expansion of its facilities, groundlessly asserting that this would harm the faith of Muslims in the area.
If your faith is so weak that it would be threatened by a new church building, I have to wonder what kind of example you are setting for those considering your religion.
Moreover, this zero-sum mentality conveniently ignores the fact that the right way to compete is not to tear the other person down, but to build yourself up.
If you feel that Christian proselytisation is getting out of hand, the right thing to do is to carry out your own dakwah rather than telling the Christians to shut up. If your faith is strong, if your faith is right, what are you afraid of? (The same goes for fundamentalist Christians who seek to tear the Muslim faith down.)
And of course, we have these moral policing vigilantes who do nothing but muddy our nation's name every time they catch a non-Muslim couple and haul them in for supposedly violating Islamic law. (This is just what happened to an American tourist couple — and will continue happening, as long as these extremists are not reined in.)
Religion is a personal relationship between man and God. No one — not the imam, not the Pope, not the Dalai Lama (unless you're the kind of Buddhist who is also an atheist), not the government — can or should come between the individual and God.
Who is to tell me that my relationship with God is not right? Who is to tell me that God does not like what I am doing? If you do not like what I am doing, that's a different story — you have grounds for complaint. If your only problem is that I'm not doing what's right in the eyes of God, that's between me and Him — get your nose out of our relationship, you pervert.
At this point, the fundamentalist Muslims are probably shrieking, "This isn't any of your business! You're a non-Muslim, so only talk about Islam when it concerns you!"
Excuse me? Who is it who injected the state, the government, into this personal relationship between man and God? It was this extremist interpretation of religion — and as a Malaysian taxpayer, I have every right to complain about how my tax ringgit are spent.
When a Malaysian is told by my government she cannot believe what she wants to believe, when a human being cannot be in a relationship with God because of my government, it is every bit my business. Don't patronise me with your paranoia, and stop being a peeping Tom when it comes to how others relate with God — it is not your or the government's place to be a voyeur.
Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.
Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.
Comments
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss this and other ramblings at the forums.
(Alternatively, contact the author privately.)
| Related comments from forum thread "Islamic law": | |
|---|---|
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 12:53:00 pm Oct 23, 2005
So lately I've been arguing politics on a certain blog. (Yes, I know the blogger's writings are a bit off-putting at first, but after a while you get used to the weirdness.) Anyway, I've made rather long-ish posts here, here and here. Now, it seems that in the latter, I pushed somebody's buttons when I argued against the implementation of hudud laws (which provide for amputation and stoning for certain crimes; PAS tried to implement them in Kelantan and Terengganu, but it turns out only the federal government can make hudud law; PAS also stated it would eventually make hudud laws apply to non-Muslims, so there goes the usual argument in favour of it). Now, what I would like to know is just how much we here value separation of religion and state. In the US, this is pretty much sacrosanct, although a few Republicans would beg to differ. In the UK, although the Anglican Church is officially the Church of England, it raises all its funds privately, without government aid. Here in Malaysia, our ringgit subsidises the construction and maintenance of mosques and syariah courts. Now, I don't mind this arrangement, especially since our implementation of syariah law (which varies from state to state) tends to be humane. With the hudud, I find amputation in particular barbaric (even if the Quran mandates it). Stoning is also a cruel and unusual punishment, I would say, especially considering it can be quite slow. (In Terengganu, PAS stated that "medium-sized stones" would be used.) Even if hudud would not be made applicable to non-Muslims, I would still protest it, because I believe all Malaysians should be equal under the law (as the constitution states) and I believe I must stand up for Malaysians, even if they are not of my religion. There are two common defenses used by fundamentalist Muslims to rebutt this argument. The first is that this is none of my business because it only affects Muslims. As I said, anything done by the government that affects Malaysians is our business. The second rebuttal used is that "we don't protest against your religion's rules, so why are you doing so?" Well, it's one thing to follow the rules of your religion. It's another to make it law that all people who profess to follow your religion must follow the same rules you do. (By the way, do you guys think I should put any of my further responses here instead of on that other blog? I think it's often standard practice amongst bloggers to carry out debates in this manner...) |
| Last five replies (0 comments not shown): | |
|
User61
Member Posts: 17 IP Logged | Posted at 5:58:49 pm Nov 18, 2005
Here are two papers on this issue. One is by Kairos Malaysia (a Malaysian Christian think-tank) and the other by Dr. Syad Saleem Faruqi, a law professor. 1. Does the Federal Constitution support an Islamic or secular state? (pdf) by Kairos Malaysia 2. JURISDICTION OF FEDERAL AND STATE AUTHORITIES TO PUNISH OFFENCES AGAINST THE PRECEPTS OF ISLAM: A CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE (pdf) by Prof. Dr. Shad Saleem Faruqi |
|
no_game
Member Posts: 182 IP Logged | Posted at 11:37:49 am Nov 21, 2005
Uhh John this their country let them do w/e they want.As if by talking like this we can prevent anything from happening. |
|
chickster
Member Posts: 168 IP Logged | Posted at 4:36:26 am Nov 22, 2005
lol ya malaysia belongz 2 d malayz ^_^ |
|
johnleemk
Infernally Rambling Thoughtless Mind Head Administrator Posts: 948 IP Logged | Posted at 4:14:24 am Nov 24, 2005
Uh...as long as our IC is blue, we're Malaysian citizens. We ostensibly live in a democracy, so we're supposed to be able to speak our views, as citizens of Malaysia. |
