Infernal Ramblings
A Malaysian Perspective on Politics, Society and Economics

Politics, An Irrational Science

Written by johnleemk on 10:40:45 am Oct 15, 2007.
Categories: ,

One thing that continually befuddles political analysts, wherever they are, is the confounding behaviour of voters. The United States has politics down to a science (so their political scientists might claim), but examining their performance in the past two presidential elections, one would think this was anything but a science.

One thing politicians learn very quickly if they do not intuitively know it already is that people are swayed by their emotions, not their thoughts.

Your goal in a speech is thus not to appeal to their rationality, but to their irrationality — to make them feel, not think, that you are the best candidate.

Economics frequently assumes that all individuals are rational actors, calculating the costs and benefits of each action to them and behaving accordingly.

We know that this is not true, and many economists — most recently Alan Greenspan — have suggested that a more accurate view of individual actions ought to be taken.

The interesting thing about economics, however, is that its assumptions often work because they usually hold true. For a substantial portion of the time, some assumptions fail, but in the big picture, these deviations are not statistically significant to the point that they make most economic analyses meaningless.

The same cannot be said for political science. Economics at least gets people to quantify their confidence in something through the price system. They can count on some measure of honesty because money makes you literally, well, put your money where your mouth is.

Political scientists cannot conduct such a confident assessment of individual preferences; it's not exactly legal to poll people and get them to bet on a particular outcome.

Ironically but unsurprisingly, perhaps the most accurate predictor of election results has been online gambling websites. Although obviously they do not get every result right, far more often than not, they are right on the money.

It is a bit of a misnomer to label political science a science. A science is capable of developing a hypothesis, testing that hypothesis, and using it as a basis for future predictions. This is something political science has never been able to do; you can take the same people, with the same opinions, today and six months from now, and you can have a completely different election result each time.

Political scientists ought to acknowledge the irrationality of voters, and be honest about what political science is — it's not a science, it's an art of analysing and guessing, nothing more.


If you'd like to keep informed about updates to the site, consider subscribing to our web feed:

Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.

Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.


Latest:
Najib's Orwellian 1Malaysia

Most Recently Read

  1. The Problem With Free Trade, and How to Solve It
  2. Absolute vs Comparative Advantage
  3. Malaysia, A Statist Economy
  4. Ivy League, Here I Come
  5. Malaysia's Poor Leaders, Each PM Worse than the Last
  6. Fix Parliament, Then Fix the Rest
  7. Malaysia and Its Singaporean Inferiority Complex
  8. Extracurricular Activities Are Worthless in Malaysia
  9. Separating Head of State from Head of Government
  10. Taking A Stand Against Defamation and For Freedom of Speech
Quoth the webserver...
First of all: what is work? Work is of two kinds: first, altering the position of matter at or near the earth's surface relatively to other such matter; second, telling other people to do so. The first one is hard and meagerly paid; the second is easy and well-paid.
— Bertrand Russell