Infernal Ramblings
A Malaysian Perspective on Politics, Society and Economics

Ask A Question

Written by johnleemk on 3:21:39 pm May 27, 2007.

Recently, I fell ill with the flu, temporarily preventing me from writing new articles (and thus I owe an apology to anyone who was disappointed). During my convalescence, I scrolled through the list of every article ever published on this site and realised that a lot of their titles are questions.

I do not know if I am more likely than other writers to title essays with questions. But I think it encapsulates a good idea of how to approach writing and thinking.

As explained before in I Don't Know, I acknowledge that there are a lot of things I don't know. That means that there are a lot of questions to ask, because I don't have nearly all the answers.

When I write, I am trying to put my abstract thoughts in concrete form. Writing, then, is a process of thinking aloud.

But when I write, I don't have a fixed conclusion in mind. I am trying to get to the answer of a question, but I don't have a predetermined answer in mind.

When I already have a conclusion in mind because of preliminary thinking, I still don't have a fixed route to get there. Sometimes in the process of writing, new arguments for or against the conclusion make their way into the piece.

The most dangerous thing any writer or thinker can do, if you ask me, is to have a predetermined answer and a predetermined way of arriving at that answer. (If the fellow does not have a way of arriving at the answer, then he or she is simply not a thinker.)

This is the sort of thing that has led to many dangerous fallacies. Supply-side economics, for example, is one of them — supply-siders have a tendency to selectively compile evidence in favour of tax cuts to support their predetermined conclusion that tax cuts are always good.

Similarly, many intelligent people fall victim to conspiracy theories because they forget to ask a question about the phenomena they are investigating. They have an end in mind already, so the question is not "Who killed John. F Kennedy?" but "What evidence is there that John F. Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy?"

We have to question our fundamental ideas before going further. If we start out with an answer in our head, even our questions will end up warped, and we will look like buffoons.

If you'd like to keep informed about updates to the site, consider subscribing to our web feed:

Infernal Ramblings is a Malaysian website focusing on current events and sociopolitical issues. Its articles run the gamut from economics to society to education.

Infernal Ramblings is run by John Lee. For more, see the About section. If you have any questions or comments, do drop him a line.

Najib's Orwellian 1Malaysia

Most Recently Read

  1. Malaysia's Selective Citizenship
  2. Allow Student Initiatives
  3. Absolute vs Comparative Advantage
  4. Bahasa Rojak, the True National Language
  5. Head of State for Life?
  6. Extracurricular Activities and Subpar Academic Performance
  7. Malaysian Automobiles and the Infant Industry Argument
  8. On the Concept of Race
  9. KLCI Came Tumbling Down, Tumbling Down, Tumbling Down...
  10. Pan-Asian Models and the Road to Apartheid
Quoth the webserver...
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact than a drunken man is happier than a sober one.
— George Bernard Shaw